![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F28bfaaa2-a1f5-4031-9472-40fb78fc84de_1000x653.jpeg)
Traditionally, when Republicans find themselves in power they earnestly embark on cost-cutting and budget slashing adventures; disemboweling small agencies, imposing hiring freezes, and promising to balance the federal budget. One of their favorite targets was an independent agency where I worked for over 30 years, the Inter-American Foundation (IAF). Now that the Republican Party controls all three branches of government, its sights set on creating indiscriminate, budgetary chaos, the IAF is again caught in the crosshairs.
Created in 1969, the agency’s founders, a bipartisan collection of visionary foreign policy leaders, imagined an independent agency that provided support to non-governmental organizations and other community groups through direct action, including grants and technical assistance. Monitoring visits from the Washington-based IAF staff would ensure that taxpayer money was used in line with grant terms and conditions. Conferences, workshops, and seminars provided an avenue for peer-to-peer learning and collaboration. A robust publications program amplified the IAF’s accomplishments (and setbacks) beyond the development world into university classrooms and the general public. Outreach and collaboration with the academic community was facilitated through a fellowship program supporting original research into a wide range of grassroots development topics. For a federal government agency with a paltry annual budget that has hovered between $25 and $50 million, it is an extremely effective organization staffed by an eclectic mix of experts and generalists, all experienced in running a highly responsive, agile organization.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fcb2f2157-caf6-4387-a4d7-260642126788_698x1000.jpeg)
The IAF works at the grassroots, community level with economically disadvantaged people, responding to grant proposals and supporting solutions from community groups and nongovernmental organizations. On its website, grassroots development is defined as “the process by which disadvantaged people organize themselves to improve the social, cultural and economic well-being of their families, communities and societies.” I held various positions at the IAF (fellowship program manager, photographer/photo editor, translations coordinator, contracting specialist) and ultimately saw our role as facilitating the opportunity for beneficiaries to achieve economic and political power. Realizing early on that delivering grant funding, providing technical assistance (from teaching established accounting methods to workshops and training), and acknowledging grantees’ central role in their work, the IAF and by extension, the U.S. government, is putting its “full faith and credit” behind them. Additionally, by featuring grantees in its publications, social media posts, and public events, the IAF is saying, “you are important, your work is essential, and we believe in you because you know how to reach the solutions to your own problems.”
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F06f92670-908e-4638-9674-cd4eeacf7c01_780x1000.jpeg)
To put it bluntly, the IAF provides a pathway to economic and, ultimately, political power by channeling U.S. taxpayer funds to create and strengthen a democratic civil society throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. And it has succeeded. The record reflects numerous examples of individuals and organizations that have risen to influential and powerful positions in countries where the IAF works.
Thinking about the current wholesale, indiscriminate federal budget slashing, I always suspected that the cutting was never about budget balancing. The GOP’s domestic mandate to protect the wealthy at the expense of the working poor and other disadvantaged communities has largely (at least in my lifetime) been its, shall we say, prime directive. Extending that philosophy to international development work is merely, as we say in the biz, scaling up. Shuttering USAID, and similar international assistance, may work as a “cutting waste and fraud” propaganda move but will significantly set back by decades efforts to support civil society worldwide.
Part of the Foundation’s (as it’s affectionately called by staff) mythos was that being such a tiny agency (about 45 employees), we at times felt under siege. Though it consistently received high marks from grantees, the agency still got bogged down in government bureaucracy, staff burnout, and annual funding fights subject to the whims of a fickle Congress. The perennial question dogging the IAF, and international development organizations in general, remained, “You’ve been at this for decades and yet poverty still exists throughout Latin America. That’s not a very successful track record.”
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F6a8af651-e491-4b91-abd9-817bcff2ef03_656x1000.jpeg)
One example where quick fixes do not work: immigration. I was involved with dozens of projects aimed directly at preventing out migration from the various countries in which we worked. We supported projects ranging from education and occupational training to small business support and helping young people break free from the cycle of gang and drug violence, all designed to prevent succumbing to the desperate measures that drive people to immigrate. Approaches to long-term structural change never show immediate results but changing the realities on the ground yields results that over time can ensure the continued growth and strength of a civil society.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F6d3b77ab-1b36-41ad-9034-b2307086387d_653x1000.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc32eb81b-91d1-4cca-8539-2089afc3e1ba_1000x666.jpeg)
What the detractors of international development fail to understand (perhaps deliberately) is that economic, social, and political inequities will for the foreseeable future, continue to exist throughout the developing world (and sadly, the developed world, as well). In classic “missing forest for the trees” fashion, bean counters insist on positive results after two years when economic and social development is eternally on-going with progress measured over decades. Particularly frustrating is that foreign assistance is typically less than two percent of the federal budget’s discretionary spending, thus making any cuts miniscule relative to the overall budget.
Organizations like USAID, IAF, Peace Corps, among others, and the countless NGOs tackling health, environmental, agricultural, and economic issues continue to ensure civil society’s access to power; a mission the current administration aims to utterly break and destroy in the (unspoken, but inescapable) name of white male supremacy. Its hollow claims of rooting out fraud and waste disintegrate completely in the face of the reality that every taxpayer dollar spent on foreign assistance is repaid many times over in compensation to U.S. farmers, increased bilateral trade, improved health care, and peaceful conflict resolution.
The unavoidable effects of the colonial past throughout Latin America and the Caribbean (and around the world) and the continuing exploitation of “poor” countries for raw, natural resources is a powerful justification for supporting economic and social development. In addition to the moral and ethical dimensions, technologically advanced countries have an economic interest in supporting countries still struggling to modernize infrastructure, health care, education, and democratic reforms. The vandals (though they may be self-identifying as “Republican,” they clearly have no underlying governing philosophy or principles) now looting the government for self-enrichment have no interest in providing for the security of U.S. citizens, much less people in other countries.
Will the IAF survive this particular onslaught? During the 1980s and 90s, Jesse Helms (the ultra-conservative Senator from North Carolina) relentlessly targeted the IAF for budget reduction and even elimination. But we survived. The current attack feels more serious, though. For now, USAID is drawing the majority of the administration’s attention but the IAF, and dozens of other independent agencies will soon come under increased scrutiny. As we’re already seeing, cutting their budgets and firing staff will result in irreparable harm to thousands, if not millions, around the world.
More later…
(All photographs @ Mark Caicedo/PuraVida Photography; courtesy of IAF)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9fb20203-cf18-421e-b511-31d592ce6047_1200x803.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5173abde-2391-4ea6-a1db-1a410725c963_669x1000.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fce166744-d5c8-469b-8b88-b6f802d31338_1000x669.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa528e93f-237b-4d99-8f78-bef076c6a569_1000x683.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc7929556-8176-4d65-9d59-48b6ab6011cd_1000x675.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2729cbd1-007b-4dea-84c2-56b9979f485e_659x1000.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe52a7af9-de99-43bb-a169-db08d42cd777_1000x812.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe3322f16-9f5d-4b5b-8d45-9e85f5a049a6_870x1200.jpeg)
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe7c23076-2354-4892-8c24-37399fc11a04_830x576.jpeg)
Wonderful photos and thoughtful narrative as always. The “other” has always been in the sight lines of the GOP; it’s at the root of their practices that need to stop.
I hope IAF continues to fly, unscathed, under the Musk radar